Why Women Could Face a Greater Risk of Getting Infected with Coronavirus

By | March 22, 2020

These days specially health experts worry that the roles women hold in society as social workers, doctors, as nurses or caregivers, place them squarely in the virus’s path. Every woman should know why women could face a greater risk of getting infected with coronavirus.

It can be understood that  the coronavirus snakes its way around the world, shuttering offices  canceling events and suspending classes — some health experts do worry that the crisis can put women at a disproportionate  and higher risk, exacerbating gender, social and economic fault lines this time.

The role of gender could “impact where women and men spend their time, and the infectious agents they get in touch with, and now the nature of exposure, it’s more frequency and its greater  intensity,” declared the World Health Organization in its latest report on CONVID-19.

The roles that women have in society can place them squarely in the virus’s path and women could face more health issues.

Women make up a majority of healthcare workers, almost 71 percent according to some estimates, and most of them occupy nursing, caretakers and other responsible roles.

The province of china which is called Hubei, where the coronavirus outbreak was originated, about 90-93% of health care workers are found to be women. In the U.S. that number is around 80 percent.

During this critical situation, nurses’ levels of exposure are “higher than doctors. They’re the ones who are into drawing blood and  collecting the specimens.”

That situation is also found in other care centers and nursing homes, which is the epicenter of infections in Washington State.

No doubt, of the more than 8,001 probable SARS cases around the world in the starting of  2000s, more than half were surprisingly female and about 22 percent of total cases occurred among health care workers, say the latest report.

Most of the women around the world are also more likely to take on the burden of care at home, particularly if anybody or someone in their family is sick, Gounder added.

And because women still have to bear most of the responsibility of child-rearing, when schools are suspended that risk could be compounded then. 

You must remember the case of Ebola, it was also the case during the numerous Ebola outbreaks across Africa from 1976 to 2014.

Since women are traditionally and the primary caregivers and are responsible for preparing bodies for burial, their vulnerability to the disease has  increased. “ The rate of transmission was higher in households as compared to hospitals”.

There is no evidence of a biological gender difference or gap whenever it turns to be to vulnerability to Ebola, “more such cases were recorded among women as compared to men” during the time of 2014 outbreak.

Pregnant women face a whole different set of challenges, especially the stress of not knowing exactly how coronavirus may affect them and  their child.

However, the only information we have, based on updated research  is that the virus isn’t likely to be transmitted to her fetus from a mother.

Economically speaking, outbreaks can have a negative impact on women.  Those kinds of jobs are also normally usually the first to get sliced in periods of economic uncertainty therefore during  outbreaks, when women need to give up work and income to stay home, they can often find it harder to spring back after the crisis, said experts.

Let’s take an example, while “everybody’s income was affected by the Ebola outbreak in West Africa that time,” Smith said, “men’s income had returned to what they had made pre-outbreak faster as compared to women’s income.”

TAke away:

You should know what may be a gender-sensitive response to the coronavirus nowadays? All women should be aware of the reason that why women could face a greater risk of getting infected with coronavirus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *